Home › FAQ Hub › How does digital strategy differ between incumbents and challengers?
Strategy & PositioningHow does digital strategy differ between incumbents and challengers?
The digital strategy gap between incumbents and challengers isn’t just about technology—it’s about what they optimize for. Incumbents, burdened by…
The digital strategy gap between incumbents and challengers isn’t just about technology—it’s about what they optimize for. Incumbents, burdened by legacy systems and regulatory scrutiny, focus on modernization, integration, and compliance, investing 70% of their digital budgets in core infrastructure (McKinsey, 2024).
Challengers, unencumbered by technical debt, prioritize product innovation, speed, and market penetration, allocating 65% of resources to customer-facing features (CB Insights, 2024). Yet as challengers scale, they increasingly adopt incumbent-like disciplines—regulatory rigor, cost control, and ecosystem integration—while incumbents borrow from challengers’ playbook, embracing agile delivery, embedded finance, and open banking. The result? A convergence of strategies, but with distinct paths to execution.
The Strategic Divide: What Each Side Optimizes For
1. Incumbents: The Modernization Marathon
Primary Goals:
- Core system modernization (e.g., replacing 30-year-old mainframes).
- Omnichannel consistency (e.g., seamless branch-to-app handoffs).
- Cost efficiency (e.g., reducing cost-to-serve by 20-30%).
Key Challenges:
| Challenge | Root Cause | Incumbent Response |
|---|---|---|
| Legacy tech debt | 40% of IT budgets spent on maintenance (Gartner, 2024) | Cloud migration + API-first architecture |
| Regulatory compliance | 50+ regulatory changes annually (Thomson Reuters, 2024) | Dedicated compliance teams + regtech |
| Cultural inertia | Siloed business/IT teams | Cross-functional squads + agile coaching |
Where They Win:
Trust and scale: : 85% of consumers still trust traditional banks for complex products (Edelman, 2024).
Data advantages: : Incumbents hold 10x more customer data than challengers (BCG, 2024).
Ecosystem leverage: : Partnerships with fintechs (e.g., JPMorgan + OnDeck) drive 15% revenue growth (McKinsey, 2024).
Case Study: HSBC’s Digital Turnaround
• Challenge: Challenge: 60% of transactions still processed via legacy systems (2020).
Strategy:
Core modernization: Migrated 80% of retail banking to cloud (AWS/Azure).
Omnichannel: Launched “HSBC Kinetic” for SMEs, reducing onboarding time by 70%.
Cost efficiency: Automated 50% of back-office processes, saving $1.2B annually.
Result: Digital customer satisfaction rose from 68% to 85% (HSBC, 2024).
2. Challengers: The Speed-to-Market Sprint
Primary Goals:
- Market share acquisition (e.g., Revolut’s 35M+ users in 8 years).
- Speed-to-market (e.g., launching products in weeks, not years).
- Embedded distribution (e.g., partnering with e-commerce, gig economy platforms).
Key Challenges:
Convergence of Incumbent and Challenger Strategies
| Challenge | Root Cause | Challenger Response |
|---|---|---|
| Regulatory scaling pains | Licensing costs (£5M+ for UK banking licence) | BaaS partnerships (e.g., Clearbank) |
| Customer acquisition | High CAC in crowded markets | Viral referrals + embedded finance |
| Profitability | Unit economics often negative | Freemium models + premium upsells |
Where They Win:
Customer experience: : Challengers score 20% higher in NPS for digital journeys (Bain, 2024).
Agility: : Deploy 10x more features annually than incumbents (Forrester, 2024).
Niche domination: : 70% of challengers focus on underserved segments (e.g., freelancers, SMEs).
Case Study: Revolut’s Blitzscaling Playbook
• Challenge: Challenge: Compete with incumbents while scaling globally.
Strategy:
Speed: Launched 200+ features/year (vs. 20-30 at traditional banks).
Market penetration: Expanded to 35 countries in 6 years via local partnerships.
Embedded finance: Integrated with Shopify, Uber, and Wise, adding 12M users/year.
Result: Valuation grew from $1.7B (2018) to $33B (2024).
The Convergence: When Challengers Grow Up and Incumbents Speed Up
1. Challengers Adopt Incumbent Disciplines
As challengers scale, they face three incumbent-like realities:
Regulatory intensity: Monzo spent £30M on compliance in 2023 (up 200% YoY).
Cost pressure: N26’s path to profitability required cutting 1,000 jobs (2023).
Legacy integration: Revolut acquired legacy banking licences to expand in Asia.
How They Adapt:
| Discipline | Challenger Approach | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | “Regtech-by-design” (e.g., automated KYC) | Starling Bank’s real-time AML checks |
| Cost efficiency | Hyper-automation (e.g., chatbots for CS) | Monzo’s 80% automated customer service |
| Ecosystem integration | Open banking partnerships | Tide’s SME marketplace |
2. Incumbents Borrow Challenger Tactics
To compete, incumbents are adopting three challenger-like behaviors:
Agile delivery: Goldman Sachs’ Marcus team deploys code daily (vs. quarterly at legacy banks).
Embedded finance: BBVA’s open banking platform now powers 3,000+ third-party apps.
Niche focus: Santander’s PagoNxt targets Latin American remittances, a $100B+ market.
How They Adapt:
| Tactic | Incumbent Approach | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Spin-off digital units (e.g., Goldman’s Marcus) | HSBC’s Zing (Asia digital bank) |
| Customer obsession | Design thinking + UX labs | Lloyds’ UX overhaul (NPS +15pts) |
| Ecosystem plays | Fintech acquisitions + APIs | JPMorgan’s $1B fintech investment fund |
The Hybrid Future: Four Models Emerging
| Model | Description | Example | Key Metric |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulated Challenger | Scaled fintechs adopting incumbent compliance | Revolut (banking licence) | 30% lower CAC post-licence |
| Agile Incumbent | Traditional banks with startup speed | Goldman Sachs (Marcus) | 3x faster feature deployment |
| Embedded Finance Player | Banks/fintechs distributing via non-financial platforms | Stripe (Treasury) | 50% higher conversion rates |
| Ecosystem Orchestrator | Platforms integrating multiple financial services | BBVA (Open Platform) | 20% revenue from partnerships |
Three Rules for Winning the Convergence Game
Incumbents: Incumbents: Steal the Challenger’s Playbook—But Keep Your Strengths
Do: Launch digital-only sub-brands (e.g., Chase UK).
• Don’t: Abandon your trust and scale advantages.
Challengers: Challengers: Build Compliance Muscle Without Losing Speed
Do: Invest in regtech automation (e.g., Monzo’s compliance engine).
• Don’t: Let regulatory costs erode your unit economics.
Both: Both: Master the Art of Partnership
Incumbents: Use fintechs for last-mile innovation (e.g., HSBC + Bud for open banking).
Challengers: Leverage incumbents for scale and trust (e.g., Starling + Raisin for deposits).
The Bottom Line: Strategy > Speed or Scale Alone
The winners won’t be the fastest or the biggest—they’ll be the firms that best combine incumbent resilience with challenger agility. As Starling Bank’s Anne Boden puts it:
“The future belongs to banks that act like tech companies and tech companies that act like banks.”
Related questions
On this page
Partner with the experts.
Let's discuss how Optimizium can accelerate your roadmap and navigate complex digital transformation.
Schedule a consultation →